Publication de FlightSim Studio E-Jets pour MSFS

FSNews

Author

January 11, 2023

Releases

FlightSim Studio a publié son rendu très attendu des Embraer E-Jets pour Microsoft Flight Simulator. AviationLads a teasé cet avion depuis plus d'un mois déjà. Avec les derniers livestreams et previews, FlightSim Studio a publié son E-Jets en accès anticipé. Ce nouveau rendu de l'Embraer 170 et 175 offre un modèle 3D détaillé de son homologue réel avec tous ses petits détails modélisés. Il y a des textures PBR, un givrage personnalisé ainsi qu'un éclairage intérieur et extérieur. FlightSim Studio propose déjà sept livrées différentes avec cette version, les plus notables étant KLM, United et American Airlines.

FlightSim Studio a créé une représentation détaillée de ce jet à courte portée avec une dynamique de vol correcte, un soundpack personnalisé et une simulation détaillée des systèmes. L'équipe n'a pas non plus laissé de côté le FMS, qui permet aux pilotes de contrôler l'ensemble du vol et le comportement de l'avion. FlightSim Studio a publié son E-Jets en tant que version d'accès anticipé pour le moment. Toutefois, cela va progressivement changer. En effet, l'équipe de développement promet de nombreuses mises à jour pour cet add-on. Avec ces mises à jour progressives, l'équipe de développement va augmenter le prix de ce produit, deux fois au total. Ils n'ont pas mentionné quand cela va se produire et de combien le prix va augmenter, mais c'est certain.

À l'heure actuelle, vous pouvez obtenir ces deux avions en un seul paquet pour 33,58 €. Ce prix ne comprend toutefois pas la TVA locale, qui augmentera considérablement le prix au moment du paiement. Vous pouvez vous procurer les E-Jets de FlightSim Studio par le biais de la magasin d'Aerosoft.

Comments

szmark

over 3 years ago

"FlightSim Studio has created a detailed depiction of this short-range jet with correct flight dynamics, custom soundpack and detailed system simulation."
Okay, that is just not true! I don't want to bash the developers any further because they got their share already, but saying this has detailed system simulation is very misleading! At this point it's just slightly above Captain Sim quality...

Onkelpuh

over 3 years ago

a new competitor to CS and Bredok??? 🤣 😂 🤣

mholden020

over 3 years ago

Picked this up yesterday, a fantastic start and a LOT of potential! Can't wait to see it develop in the coming months

damswallace

over 3 years ago

I read a review which is saying that this plane doesn't worth the 30 bucks (for now) and it's not sure it will. Promises...

HarryJohnson

over 3 years ago

Complaints from the developer saying "development is hard" in 3.....2.....1.....

tornadocrow

over 3 years ago

My guess is a pretty face with no personality (systems). They promise updates, and I hope they make them, but I still suspect that they'll grab what they can and fly away.

JeromeJ

over 3 years ago

'The team also didn’t leave the FMS behind, which allows pilots to control the whole flight and aeroplane behaviour. 'Apart from it is just a reskin of the default MSFS flight control system.....No Vnav, no altitude restriction capture......

Andrew.Glowacki

over 3 years ago

Bought y/day, did a flight WAW-VNO. Flight dynamics is ok although I had a feeling like the aircraft is a bit too light (had 2.5t cargo and 70 pax). The systems are far from detailed, that is true (the description by FSS is not true). FMC is non existent. There is radio page which is functional, some additional pages from flight planning and performance, but statement that the aircraft simulates systems is misleading. Textures are just beautiful. VNAV is not there but you can still control speed during climb via FLCH (Flight Level Change) button and this works nice. The aircraft holds cruise speed as well. I did struggle to understand how to navigate thru map settings, like distance display etc. And I do not agree with the article above that the most notable liveries are KLM, United and AA. I think it would be nice to state, that a launch customer's livery is included (Polish Airlines) and I would not count FSS livery as one of the seven. Anyway, out of five stars I'd take one for misleading description of aircraft systems, one other for aircraft handling which feels a bit light. I do not think this aircraft (in a state it is sold) is worth $40 (the description of a price is not true either - $33 they say is excluding VAT, so there's $6 on top) and for this misinformation I'd take another star. So two stars is all I'd give this aircraft , or more precisely developer and the aircraft (at the moment) although I did enjoy the flight I made.

Andrew.Glowacki

over 3 years ago

Kiddo, quit it. Most of us here have been in sim world for years and years and we've seen it all over and over again - promises not delivered. It's not about complaining for the sake of complaining. Do read the reviews and what these point out. It's not about what will be but what is and the price for which it is delivered. You're not the only one waiting for proper embraer, I can definately stand beside you when it comes to love for flying E-Jets but all of the reports and descriptions and demo videos showed something quite different to what we see and that is not right. I won't be far from truth and few will hold it against me, when I speak for most of us sim pilots - this is not what we saw on the trailers, this is not what we expected from trailers and we would have gladly wait another 3-6mo to get at least proper-er FMC.If the authors of this project are serious about it, that these reviews will make them understand that we do not appreciate hastily delivered product, rather well finished aircraft. On the other thing, lots of sim pilots are waiting for these reviews to decide if hey want to spend their money on the product.

mholden020

over 3 years ago

That's the thing: It's Early Access, not a "well finished product". Nobody seems to understand that, or they're willfully ignoring it. Like I said on another site: If you were having a house built, you wouldn't complain about it having no roof before it was finished. If you want a more finished product, wait for updates and get it then, but right now it's exactly what was advertised.

jaypee741

over 3 years ago

This isnt early access, this is Alpha.

mholden020

over 3 years ago

Okay, that's certainly an opinion you can have about it but the same thing applies: Alpha is an early state of development and we have early access to the product. It was stated as being incomplete from the outset, expecting a complete product is nonsensical.

henkhugo

over 3 years ago

The most telling thing about how bad it is has to be the lack of repaints on flightsim.to - normally when a new product is released there is a rush of repaints within 24H. It is as if they see who can get the repaint out first. Nada after two days - the only repaint is from the media partners.

wfm18

over 3 years ago

I love it how people do not understand what early access means. Yes, you get an half broken product with minimal features. The roadmap for this package is very promising and I expect that when the E170 drops the E175 will be much more stable. It's essentially at this moment about supporting the developer during the early phases of the product. They need constructive feedback to move the product forward.

MAK8910

over 3 years ago

It's actually not bad at all. I think they will improve on it, but as a start it's okay. Better than the garbage VirtualCol.

lufsdc

over 3 years ago

And the FMS is far away from the real deal! It's more boeingish than the real Honeywell that equips the real bird! Modelling is not accurate as well, the MCP is totally funny (embraers don't have lights on MCP, all flight modes appear only on the FMA's)

lufsdc

over 3 years ago

The problem here is the way that they promised dude... They didn't say nothing about "early access" until they released an incomplete and inaccurate addon! MCP, FMS, Systems, Load and Balance, performance and even modelling...

lufsdc

over 3 years ago

They didn't say nothing about it until they forced the release and received many negative feedbacks... the addon modelling, FMS, MCP, even load and performance are totally wrong, that's the thing! Really expecting to be improved, but not sure about if it's the deal of them... they promised a lot and it's just a funny play.

Helibrewer

over 3 years ago

For me, it is like a Kickstarter Project that I get to start using now. No problem with it

flilot

over 3 years ago

The real aircraft DO have lights on the MCP, but they are inactive by default. Developer has stated the lights were enabled in the initial builds to help with development to show which modes were enabled, to correlate with both aircraft behaviour and what the FMAs were displaying.

Kiwipilot

over 3 years ago

Isn't it funny how people dwell on the negatives, eg no VNAV. Surprising isn't it that MSFS2020 doesn't have it yet either by default.

hotdogac

over 3 years ago

Firstly, ill give some slack due to it being early access. I still think they lied about the product though. very few systems work at all. The plane flies fine, but seems very default flight model like. Good visuals but its very damaging to FPS, about 40% worse than PMDG 737 products.
I do believe this product will come around, but sadly this developer has gone the way of many game devs and half assed a product while hyping it up far too much. This plane simply isnt ready, even for early access, this feels like an alpha build.

quelcertoleo

over 3 years ago

FlightSim Studio has created a detailed depiction of this short-range jet with correct flight dynamics, custom soundpack and detailed system simulation.this is a blatant lie and, to be completely honest, I am starting to wonder about the transparency of this article and this website.

ncsandy

over 3 years ago

Plane needs lots of work. Will revisit it in 6 months

thommy24dd

over 3 years ago

I am very sorry to say that, but 40 Euro for a plane what is an early access version with that many bugs and missing features, where nobody even knows if this plane will be continued and the issues will ever be fixed!? no way!

xumy94

over 3 years ago

it's because they are still crating the paint kid

Spartan300

over 3 years ago

I guess these are different from the pay ware above. I got both the 175/195 at no cost

failuretoreport

over 3 years ago

I would take CS and Bredok alllllllllll day over Virtualcol and their ERJ ...which is exactly why I'm not going to touch this until it's "finished" and someone uploads a full flight that demonstrates it's not more garbage.
So fucking sad the only developers I trust enough to buy now are PMDG ( I don't really do Airbus, but I'm down with LatinVFR since their aircraft support using the FlyByWire systems, and it's soooooo pathetic that FlyByWire is a freeware developer and their product is YEARS ahead of all the cash grab garbage on the MSFS storefront.)

MatP

over 3 years ago

I had the misfortune of trying to complete a flight in this yesterday - save your money, it's appalling.

Andrew.Glowacki

over 3 years ago

At the moment, their biggest problem is fps hit. When I was writing this comment I was achieving 20fps (comparing to JustFlight avro 39fps and Aerosoft CRJ 40fps), therefore aircraft not flyable at all for me.