![[GSX Pro] LIMC - Aerosoft Milano Malpensa [Official Rework IVAO & VATSIM] - Image 1](https://cdn.flightsim.to/images/28/20260430_122610_e73db5d418f6055d_limc-milano-malpensa-gsx-pro-profile-aerosoft.png)
Description
Detailed GSX Pro Profile - Aerosoft Milano Malpensa (ICAO: LIMC - IATA: MXP).
!! All other gates and parking are completed and ready to use. Enjoy ;)
MAKE SURE TO REPOSITION YOUR AIRCRAFT AS SOON AS YOU SPAWN IN THE SIM
INSTALLATION & VDGS USAGE IN READ ME FILE
Features:
- Complete rework of GSX profile allowing for latest Feature;
- Full GSX-VDGS integration at Parkings which requires them in real life (SEE ABOVE),
Aerosoft VDGS Profile also available to select;
- Realistic Handlers and Caterer with dedicated description file (SEE SCREENSHOT),
- Accurate GSE placement based on IRL experience,
- Realistic Walk-In passenger path at Easyjet Terminal 2
- Realistic Walk-In passenger path in Gates used by Ryanair and Wizzair at Terminal 1
- Custom Gates Names (SEE SCREENSHOT),
- Custom Stop Position for each A/C,
- Accurate Airlines-Parking coding.
- Custom Pushback procedure:
Tug Release Point,
- Engine start clearance point;
- Custom De-Icing Areas.
!! This Profile accurately tries to represent real life operation at Milano Malpensa, It has been created mainly for usage in combination with Online Network such IVAO & Vatsim. To permit such operation, the following change has been made:
- Some Stop Positions have been misaligned on Purpose to prevent aircraft from clipping inside jetways, buildings and ground clutter;
- Some parking and gates have been renamed to represent ramp dynamics in Malpensa.
ENJOY AND PLEASE REPORT ANY ISSUE IN THE COMMENTS.
Commentaires(51)
Connectez-vous pour participer à la discussion
Se connecterCommentaire épinglé
j
about 4 hours ago
777 cargo parking, none available. it should be on the spots to the side
F
about 1 month ago
Thanks for the Profile!
BUT: You're changing the Refuel Side on the Aircraft and that is not a good Design. It is something defined in the Aircraft Profile so it shouldn't be changed by the Airport Profile!
BUT: You're changing the Refuel Side on the Aircraft and that is not a good Design. It is something defined in the Aircraft Profile so it shouldn't be changed by the Airport Profile!
L
LucaverzuraAuthor
21 days ago
Ciao, Handler script takes care of it without interference to the aircraft itself, it’s just a visual thing, As done in MXP Refuelling on jetway side is preferred when the airline uses bridge boarding.
F
21 days ago
How can you call something not interfering when you override something that is not the Domain of the Airport Profile?
The Refuel Location is defined by the Aircraft Profile. It IS interfering with what GSX internally, the Aircraft Developer or the User sets for the Aircraft. Especially when other Apps try to interface with GSX and the Aircraft and build on the Defaults set by GSX' internal Aircraft Profiles (or the ones provided by the Developer) the Interference becomes even greater.
Changing that on the Fly in the Handler, makes it impossible for every native or external Integration that the Side was changed and adopt Service Calls accordingly.
I really appreciate your Effort and Work to make the Airport Profile as realistic as it can be. But we're still talking about an Addon in a Simulator that can only work in certain Ways and has Limitations.
The Refuel Location is defined by the Aircraft Profile. It IS interfering with what GSX internally, the Aircraft Developer or the User sets for the Aircraft. Especially when other Apps try to interface with GSX and the Aircraft and build on the Defaults set by GSX' internal Aircraft Profiles (or the ones provided by the Developer) the Interference becomes even greater.
Changing that on the Fly in the Handler, makes it impossible for every native or external Integration that the Side was changed and adopt Service Calls accordingly.
I really appreciate your Effort and Work to make the Airport Profile as realistic as it can be. But we're still talking about an Addon in a Simulator that can only work in certain Ways and has Limitations.
L
LucaverzuraAuthor
3 days ago
@Fragtality, right I got you, now then, have you experienced any issues at all? Because following multiple testing, I didn't have any complaints or bug manifest.
If this is the case, I am more than willing to correct them and provide a more robust solution.
Should this not match your expectations, I apologise for the inconvenience, please feel free to modify the profile to your own taste
If this is the case, I am more than willing to correct them and provide a more robust solution.
Should this not match your expectations, I apologise for the inconvenience, please feel free to modify the profile to your own taste
F
3 days ago
Yeah, I encountered it as Issue while using the PMDG 777(F) in Conjunction with Any2GSX. The internal GSX Profile and therefor the 777 Plugin (in A2G) default to the Refuel Location on the Left/Stair Side. Which for A2G means it handles the Stair Calls differently to allow Stairs and Refuel to be active at the same Time on that Side. So the Airport Profile had interfered with the Flow/Calls for Stairs & Refuel.
This Difference in A2G might be removed in future Builds, some early Tests with the new GSX Vehicle Paths & Checks seem to allow Stairs & Refuel to happen on the same Side. But for the Moment it still acts that Way. (Still have to wrap my Head around the new/first GSX WS API ^^)
But in any Case, I still believe that Airport Profiles shouldn't override Settings especially Positions in the Aircraft Profile. The Aircraft (and so its Profile) is basically the 'Avatar' of the Player so the 'Level' shouldn't change where Things are gonna be attached. Also when it is not a Custom/User Aircraft Profiles but a (Aircraft) Developer-provided Profile, it would also mean that such an Airport Profile would change Stuff the Aircraft Developer had envisioned differently.
A Fix/Workaround was easy for me, since I just quickly removed the respective Lines in the Python File. But the 'Average Joe' GSX User might be confused ^^
Thanks for your Understanding! I really like the Profile, keep up the great Work :)
This Difference in A2G might be removed in future Builds, some early Tests with the new GSX Vehicle Paths & Checks seem to allow Stairs & Refuel to happen on the same Side. But for the Moment it still acts that Way. (Still have to wrap my Head around the new/first GSX WS API ^^)
But in any Case, I still believe that Airport Profiles shouldn't override Settings especially Positions in the Aircraft Profile. The Aircraft (and so its Profile) is basically the 'Avatar' of the Player so the 'Level' shouldn't change where Things are gonna be attached. Also when it is not a Custom/User Aircraft Profiles but a (Aircraft) Developer-provided Profile, it would also mean that such an Airport Profile would change Stuff the Aircraft Developer had envisioned differently.
A Fix/Workaround was easy for me, since I just quickly removed the respective Lines in the Python File. But the 'Average Joe' GSX User might be confused ^^
Thanks for your Understanding! I really like the Profile, keep up the great Work :)
S
about 1 month ago
Ciao, am I the only one that is unable to operate the jetways? I tried everything but I always get the "gate has no jetway" GSX message (MSFS2024). Thank you!
S
about 1 month ago
P.S. I already repositioned my aircraft after spawning. This is not an issue with this custom GSX profile but with the scenery itself. Just looking out for help anywhere I can. Grazie :)
L
LucaverzuraAuthor
21 days ago
Unfortunately if it’s scenery related, It has to come from Aerosoft, GSX doen not control Jetway data.
j
2 months ago
None of the heavy gates fit a 777? It's all too far forward from stop lines.
L
LucaverzuraAuthor
2 months ago
what do you mean, can you pass me some examples?
I
2 months ago
Hello i was wondering if you could turn your handler script for asking to use airstair into a GSX aircraft profile for PMDG 737-800 and iFly 737 max 8 only for ryanair?? Thankss
L
LucaverzuraAuthor
2 months ago
Ciao, It was originally added but was not working properly on arrival due to GSX limitation, will be fixed when a change is made
I
2 months ago
Alright thanks. it worked perfectly when i departed :D
L
LucaverzuraAuthor
2 months ago
Great to know :):)
X
3 months ago
Just a small issue regarding the new handler script, RYR uses Airport Handling, not DNATA
L
LucaverzuraAuthor
3 months ago
Ciao, Airport Handling has been bought out by DNATA, you were correct until a few months ago, but DNATA acquired the remaining 40% from SEA Aeroporti di Milano
X
3 months ago
Thanks for the info.
Y
6 months ago
Download Options are confusing. Option 1: Latest Version Option 2: MSFS2024 1.0.5
So is that a typo? Because the latest LIMC version is 1.5.0.
So what do I download? The latest version or is this MSFS2020? Or do I download The "1.0.5" MSFS2024 version?
I run MSFS2024 latest Aerosoft LIMC 1.5.0 version.
EDIT: It seems to be a typo in MSFS2024. In the sim it is showing 1.5.0 on the Aerosoft homepage it shows 1.0.5. Download Option 1 also seems to be 2020er version according to the folder name after download. Just in case someone got confused as I was.
So is that a typo? Because the latest LIMC version is 1.5.0.
So what do I download? The latest version or is this MSFS2020? Or do I download The "1.0.5" MSFS2024 version?
I run MSFS2024 latest Aerosoft LIMC 1.5.0 version.
EDIT: It seems to be a typo in MSFS2024. In the sim it is showing 1.5.0 on the Aerosoft homepage it shows 1.0.5. Download Option 1 also seems to be 2020er version according to the folder name after download. Just in case someone got confused as I was.
L
LucaverzuraAuthor
3 months ago
Fixed In latest Build, Naming is now more convenient for users
MSFS 2020MSFS 2024
[GSX Pro] LIMC - Aerosoft Milano Malpensa [Official Rework IVAO & VATSIM]
The LIMC Milano Malpensa GSX Pro Profile offers a comprehensive update for Aerosofts Milano Malpensa airport.
Téléchargements9K
VersionvFS 2020 - Aerosoft Malpensa 2020
Taille du fichier112.5 KB
PubliéIl y a 1 an
Mis à jourIl y a 2 mois
Avis des utilisateurs
4.8
6 avis
5
83%
4
17%
3
0%
2
0%
1
0%
More Information
Historique des versions
Added Handler Script to take advatage of latest GSX features.
3 months ago